Mooney v. Town of Stowe
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
¶ 1. February 8, 2008. Plaintiff Joseph Mooney appeals from summary judgment. The trial court ruled that plaintiff’s rights were not violated when defendant Town of Stowe refused to warn a decomposed budget for approval by Australian ballot for the 2006 town meeting, as was mandated by a majority vote of Stowe residents at an earlier special meeting. We affirm.
¶ 2. Plaintiff is a resident of, and registered voter in, the Town of Stowe. In November 2005, he attended a duly warned special town meeting called by the Town selectboard. The agenda for the meeting, as warned, was for legal voters to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dulude v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Kirchner v. GiebinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. PecoraSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Beliveau NOV, Town of Fairfax v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In re Burlington Airport PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re Petition of VTel Wireless Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Audet WW System & Potable Water Supply PermitVermont Superior Court · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.