Legal Opinion

State v. Sanderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1990No. 374A86PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

Defendant argues he is entitled to a new sentencing proceeding, listing several assignments of error. Because of the decision in McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. ---, 108 L. Ed. 2d 369 (1990), we order a new sentencing proceeding.

Defendant pleaded guilty to charges of first degree murder and first degree kidnapping at arraignment at the 7 April 1986 Criminal Session of Superior Court, Davidson County, Ross, J., presiding. Venue for sentencing was changed, and sentencing proceedings were conducted at the 27 May 1987 Criminal Session of Superior Court, Iredell County,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. KirkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. SandersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API