Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1992No. 48A88PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*492MEYER, Justice.

Defendant, Edward Lee Cummings, argues that each of seven alleged errors by the trial court entitles him to a new trial. In the alternative, defendant argues that alleged errors in the sentencing proceeding require this Court to vacate his death sentence. We find no error in the guilt-innocence phase of defendant’s trial but vacate the death sentence and remand the case for a new capital sentencing proceeding because of McKoy error that we do not find harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Defendant was indicted by a Hoke County grand jury on 20 February 1986 for the murders of…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. HandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. Mammone (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API