Legal Opinion

North River Barge Line v. Chile S.S. Co., Inc. The Creek. The Mary L. McAllister

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 2, 1954No. 23022_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. The opinion and findings of the district judge, reported in 111 F.Supp. 895, sufficiently state the facts. As he saw and heard the witnesses, we cannot say that his findings of fact are “clearly erroneous.” We regard as wholly untenable Chile’s argument, as applied to the facts, that the date of the oral charter, February 20, 1948 — when there was likely to be heavy ice on the river — shows that libellant, owner of the scow, assumed the risk of ice-caused damage. It is immaterial that Chile was a sub-charterer. Libellant is clearly entitled to recover from one or the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. The Steamer SyracuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Compania De Navegacion Interior, S. A. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. The OceanicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Crescent Towing & Salvage Company v. Dixilyn Drilling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Chile Steamship Co. v. The Tug Justine McAllisterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. v. Consolidated Towing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1975
  5. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API