Chile Steamship Co. v. The Tug Justine McAllister
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
In this in personam action, the libellant seeks recovery for damages to its scow, Raritan, which resulted from a collision between the scow and the tug Justine McAllister.
Findings of Fact.
1. The libellant, Chile Steamship Company, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, at all times under consideration was the owner of the scow Raritan, and the respondent, McAllister Brothers, Inc., a New York corporation, at all times under consideration was the owner of the tug Justine McAllister, and on February 14, 1955 operated and controlled the tug.
2. On November 12, 1953 the respondent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- The OceanicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- North River Barge Line v. Chile S.S. Co., Inc. The Creek. The Mary L. McAllisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crescent Towing & Salvage Company v. Dixilyn Drilling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- American Bridge Division, United States Steel Corp. v. Roen Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963