Legal Opinion

United States v. Louis Phillip Ayendes and James Frazier Noles

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1976No. 76-1214, 76-1215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

On appeal from their convictions for armed bank robbery the appellants contend that photographic arrays shown to eyewitnesses were so unnecessarily and impermissibly suggestive as to require suppression of in-court identifications of the appellants by these witnesses. Each case involving the issue of pretrial photographic identification must be considered on its own facts.

A branch of the Second National Bank of Warren, Ohio was robbed by two white men at approximately 2:00 p. m. on January 9, 1975. Though both robbers had made some attempt to disguise their appearance,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Richard Harrison RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. David Earl Crozier (99-6561) Charles W. Burton (99-6567), United States of America v. Charles W. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Summitt v. BordenkircherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Raymond "Red" TylerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Hudson v. SowdersDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API