Legal Opinion

Hull v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 28, 1990No. CR 89-66PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carol Lacey Hull was convicted of first degree robbery and was sentenced as a habitual offender to life imprisonment without possibility of parole. On appeal, she contends that the in-court identification by an eyewitness should have been excluded because that identification was the product of an unduly suggestive photographic array displayed to the witness prior to trial and had no independent basis of reliability.

FACTS

Shortly before 2:00 p.m. on Sunday, February 1, 1987, a lone male entered Stacey's Drugstore in Bay Minette and robbed the pharmacist at gunpoint of various drugs. The robber…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Glenn S. Passman v. Frank Blackburn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Summitt v. BordenkircherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. McWilliams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Dotch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API