Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1985No. 844SC1089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant brings forward two assignments of error. The first relates to the admissibility of a vial of blood allegedly drawn from defendant at Onslow Memorial Hospital; the second challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand his motions for dismissal of the charges. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the challenged evidence was properly admitted and that the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions.

At trial the State’s evidence tended to show that the defendant was driving an Oldsmobile automobile south on U.S. 17 in On-slow County…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DrdakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Richardson v. HiattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. SteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. DrdakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API