Legal Opinion

State v. Drdak

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1991No. 9021SC384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motions to suppress the admission into evidence of defendant’s medical records including the results of a blood alcohol test on the ground that the test was not in accordance with the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-16.2 and 20-139.1. *661For the following reasons, we hold that the trial court erred and reverse the judgment of 15 November 1989.

The following facts are pertinent to this case on appeal. On 14 February 1989, defendant, an agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, met with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. ShepleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API