State v. Drdak
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motions to suppress the admission into evidence of defendant’s medical records including the results of a blood alcohol test on the ground that the test was not in accordance with the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-16.2 and 20-139.1. *661For the following reasons, we hold that the trial court erred and reverse the judgment of 15 November 1989.
The following facts are pertinent to this case on appeal. On 14 February 1989, defendant, an agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, met with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. ShepleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014