Legal Opinion
Painewebber, Inc. v. Can Am Financial Group, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 30, 1988No. 87 C 6890PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*327OPINION AND ORDER
MAROVITZ, Senior District Judge.
PaineWebber’s Motion For Sanctions
Currently pending before this court is the motion by plaintiff PaineWebber, Incorporated (hereinafter “PaineWebber”) for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (“Rule 11”) and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (“§ 1927”). To better understand the facts making up the backdrop of this motion (hereinafter “Motion For Sanctions”), a chronology of significant and relevant events is in order.
Background
On August 5, 1987, PaineWebber filed suit in this court, naming as defendants Can Am Financial Group, Ltd. (“Can…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Ethyl Corporation v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Local No. 7441, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Elizabeth Thornton v. Robert WahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Spectee Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re AlbertoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- In Re GreenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Kramer ex rel. Estate of Khan v. Mahia (In re Khan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Schmitz v. Campbell-Mithun, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.