Legal Opinion

In Re Alberto

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 12, 1990No. 19-04411PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. SQUIRES, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion for imposition of sanctions under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 filed by The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. (“CIT”), against Sam Alberto (the “Debtor”) and his attorneys Chill, Chill & Radtke, P.C. (“CC & R”), and the motion for an order to show cause filed by the Debtor against CIT and one of its attorneys, Michael Weissman (“Weissman”), for a finding of civil contempt and for relief under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court allows both motions.

I.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Clayton v. King (In Re Clayton)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1998
  2. Elvira M. Jimenez v. Madison Area Technical College, Jackye Thomas, Carol Bassett, and William StryckerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. In Re SumpterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Matthews v. United States (In Re Matthews)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 1995
  5. In Re ArmwoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API