Legal Opinion

United States of America, for the Use of Llewellyn MacHinery Corporation v. National Surety Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1959No. 17645_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant here sued the defendant Surety Corporation under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a-270d. The Surety Corporation was surety of a prime contractor, Thomson Contracting Company which had contracted to build certain works in the Bahama Islands for the United States Government. The claim here in issue represented the value of certain construction equipment furnished by appellant under a rental agreement whereby the general contractor agreed to pay approximately $1200 per month for the use of the equipment and further agreed to “assume all responsibility for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Glassell-Taylor Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Taylor v. ConnettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  5. United States ex rel. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. D. L. Taylor Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. L. G. DeFelice & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  2. McGee Steel Co. v. State Ex Rel. McDonald Industries Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Moran Towing Corporation v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Ramstad Construction Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1961
  5. Williams Construction Co. v. Construction Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API