Legal Opinion
Glassell-Taylor Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1946No. 11318PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BORAH, District Judge.
The United States, for the use and benefit of the Magnolia Petroleum Company, sued Core & Planche, subcontractor, Robinson & Young, and Glassell-Taylor, prime contractors, and St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, insurance carrier for the prime contractors, on a statutory payment bond, to recover for gasoline and oils alleged to have been furnished and delivered to the subcontractor “in the prosecution of the work” under a contract with the United States Government in connection with the building of an airdrome near DeRidder, in Louisiana.
The suit finds life and is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Noland Company, Inc. v. Allied Contractors, Incorporated, and Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Coffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- United States of America for the Use and Benefit of J. P. Byrne & Co., Inc. v. Fire Association of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Graybar Electric Company, Inc. v. John A. Volpe Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.