Legal Opinion

Dean v. Tallman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1998No. 97-72PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

This is an appeal of a chancellor’s order granting defendant-appellees’ motion for summary judgment in an illegal-exaction case. Appellant Michael Dean contends that when an ordinance of the county quorum court states a specific purpose for the tax proceeds, and the voters pass that ordinance, the State is precluded from distributing the proceeds to the county and cities of that county pursuant to the statutory per capita-distribution formula. The chancehor’s order granted summary judgment to less than all the defendants without making an express determination that there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilburn v. First State Bank of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Cortese v. Atlantic RichfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Skelton v. City of AtkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. EubanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Kinkead v. SpillersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Hambay v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Stockton v. Sentry InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Henderson v. Little Rock School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Vent v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API