Vent v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJim Hannah, Chief Justice
hi respectfully dissent. Immunity in this case is not an affirmative defense. The plain language of Arkansas Code Annotated section 21-9-301 (Repl.2004) provides not only immunity but also a substantive bar to suit where the school district is uninsured. “[Sjchool districts ... shall be immune from liability and from suit for damages.” Ark.Code Ann. § 21-9-301(a). Further, “no action shall lie.” Id. § 21 — 9—301(b). The preamble to Act 165 of 1969 that enacted section 21-9-301 reconfirms this conclusion. It declares that the public policy of the State is that “its political subdivisions shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. Pine Bluff Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Dean v. TallmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Linder v. WeaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005