Hambay v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
The appellants, Charles Hambay and others (collectively referred to as Ham-bay), appeal from an order of dismissal and summary judgment. They raise multiple issues on appeal: (1) that the chancery court erred in dismissing the illegal-exaction suit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction in light of this court’s decision in Hoyle v. Faucher, 334 Ark. 529, 975 S.W.2d 843 (1998); (2) that the chancery court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees (various county officials and the State Treasurer, collectively referred to as the County); (3) that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoyle v. FaucherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Tucker v. Lake View School District No. 25Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Pockrus v. Bella Vista Village Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Cortese v. Atlantic RichfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Seay v. Wildlife Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- City of Corning v. CochranSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Sims v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Brasfield v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.