Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Morgensen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 6, 2006No. 04-35608PublishedCited by 542 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Steven Morgan, a Washington prisoner, was injured by a defective printing press while working at a prison job for which he had voluntarily applied. Morgan alleges that he told his supervisor, Defendant Tom Canady, about the problem, but that Canady forced Morgan to keep working. Morgan brought a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the requirement to continue working under those circumstances violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Ca-nady moved for summary judgment, asserting a defense of qualified immunity, which the district court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by542 opinions
- Foster v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Tennison v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kelly Rhodes v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Virgil Hall, III v. Michael ZenkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Rayburn v. BlueDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015
537 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.