Commonwealth v. Charles
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoekfer, J.
The defendants were convicted as joint venturers on indictments alleging armed assault with intent to murder.2 The victim was shot by another person in an incident that unfolded at the Ruggles Street subway station in Boston. The judge’s instruction to the jury on the elements of joint venture did not refer to the requirement that the defendants knew the shooter was armed. We must reverse.
1. Facts3 The victim, Horacio Mays, was at the Ruggles Street station on the late afternoon of August 11, 1995, with his girlfriend Rhonneka Tavares. Their one year old daughter was also with them. They were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. ClaudioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FedericoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. StoteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DePinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. PalmerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BookmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023