Commonwealth v. Federico
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.
We must decide whether the testimony of two experts on child sexual abuse impermissibly intruded on the jury’s role of assessing the credibility of the child complainants. In Commonwealth v. Dockham, 405 Mass. 618 (1989), we held that expert testimony on the general behavioral characteristics of sexually abused children was properly admitted where the defendant had argued that such testimony should have been admitted only in response to hypothetical questions based on the facts in evidence. Here, the defendant takes the antipodal position, arguing that the testimony given in response to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. PeruzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AvilaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. Quincy Q.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. BurgessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. HarbinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.