Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Balch

This case is here for the second time. Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Balch, 105 Ind. 93.

Witnesses were permitted, to give their opinions as to the value of some of the property involved in this controversy, and this it is contended was erroneous, for the reason that the evidence does not show that it belonged to the appellee. We can not concur with counsel that there was not evidence showing that the plaintiff was the owner of the property. There was unquestionably evidence authorizing the inference that the property belonged to the plaintiff, and this was sufficient. It is not necessary to…