Legal Opinion

Winemiller v. Thrash

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1890No. 14,399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellant appeals from a judgment awarding the appellee damages for a malicious prosecution.

The trial court permitted the appellee to read in evidence the indictment which it was alleged the appellant had procured against him, together with the endorsements upon it. In this there was no error. It has often been decided that *354a record is an entirety, and as such is admissible. Papers forming a part of the record are, under the general and familiar rule, competent and proper instruments of evidence. This is especially true where, as here, the papers are prepared and filed by public…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. R. v. CollingwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Iles v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McFadden v. FritzIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State ex rel. Nave v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Satz v. KoplowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. Bank of Miller v. RichmonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bruce v. TylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API