State v. Fox
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.
The common law and statutory *55rule in American jurisprudence is that voluntary intoxication is not a defense to any crime. Long v. State (1923), 109 Ohio St. 77, 86. An exception to the general rule has developed, where specific intent is a necessary element, that if the intoxication was such as to preclude the formation of such intent, the fact of intoxication may be shown to negative this element. See 8 A.L.R. 3d 1236, Modern Status of the Rules as to Voluntary Intoxication as Defense to Criminal Charge. In such a case, intoxication, although voluntary, may be considered in determining…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Long v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. VargoOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SlagleOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Ronald Dean Combs v. Ralph CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. WolonsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.