Legal Opinion
Esco v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 30, 1965No. 6 Div. 38PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
Defendant was tried on an information, filed by the solicitor, which charged:
“That within twelve months before the commencement of this prosecution, Howard Edward Esco, ateaa-Ha-roléEdward-Esee did change or alter his name to conceal his identity, against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”. The state amended the information before arraignment by striking the words:
“alias Harold Edward Esco.”
A jury found defendant “guilty of changing or concealing his name, as charged in the Solicitor’s Complaint.” The Court of Appeals affirmed and we granted certiorari.
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Gillespie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Freeman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Bighames v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- McCrary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Dunaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.