Legal Opinion

Bighames v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 1, 1983PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ralph Edward Bighames, the appellant, was indicted and convicted for rape in the first degree. Sentence was life imprisonment. Three issues are raised on appeal.

I

Bighames argues that the trial judge erred in allowing evidence of prior rape. Under the identity exception to the general exclusionary rule prohibiting the admission of other or collateral crimes as substantive evidence of the guilt of the accused, the prior crime is not relevant to prove identity unless both that and the now-charged crime are "signature crimes" having the accused's mark and the peculiarly distinctive modus operandi…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Freeman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Nicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API