Legal Opinion

State v. Diamond

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1921No. 2532PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Colfax County; Leib, Judge. Jack Diamond was convicted of attempting to incite revolution and opposition to the organized government of the United States of America and of the State of New Mexico, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

PARKER, J.

The appellant, Jack Diamond, was convicted in the district court of Colfax county and sentenced to the penitentiary, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The indictment charged that—

The defendant “did then and there unlawfully and felon-iously attempt to incite revolution and opposition to the organized government of the United States of America and of the state of New Mexicojj.y then and there soliciting members for the Industrial Workers of the World, an organization which has for its purpose and aim the destruction of organized government, federal,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gilbert v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Ex parte JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. State v. HeislerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mitchell v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API