Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1993No. 59324-8PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Petitioner Andrew Thomas seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision which reversed the trial court's suppression order in his favor. Thomas argues that the fruits of the search warrant should be suppressed because the warrant was not executed and returned within 3 days of issuance pursuant to RCW 69.50.509. The Court of Appeals held that search warrants for controlled substances must be executed within 10 days of issuance under CrR 2.3 and returned within 3 days of execution pursuant to RCW 69.50.509. We affirm and remand this case for further proceedings.

Facts

On March 8, 1989, Everett…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. DanforthWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Omega National Insurance v. MarquardtWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Emwright v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. American Continental Ins. Co. v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cannon v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API