Legal Opinion

City of Mobile v. Havard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 28, 1972No. 1 Div. 689PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE, Justice.

Appellee Ruby W. Havard as administratrix of the estate of Henry N. Havard, deceased, brought an action in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama against eight defendants seeking damages for the death of her husband Henry N. Havard who died as the result of an automobile accident in the Bankhead Tunnel. The initial complaint was amended and various defendants dismissed so that by the time of trial the complaint consisted of two counts numbered 5 and 6 and the City of Mobile and Palmer & Baker Engineers, Inc. were the only remaining defendants.

On October 17, 1968 Henry…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Western Railway of Alabama v. MutchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. SHADES, ETC. v. Cobbs, Allen & Hall Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. A. A. Spurlin, Surviving Parent of Douglas J. Spurlin, a Minor, Deceased v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Havard v. PALMER & BAKER ENGINEERS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Ensor v. WILSON BY AND THROUGH WILSONSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API