Legal Opinion

Deering v. Holcomb

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1901No. 4048PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pacific County. — Hon. Henry S. Elliott, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

White, J.

In 1887, in Minnesota, the appellant recovered a judgment against George U. Holcomb and his father, S. Holcomb, for $445.66. On this judgment, on the 18th of November, 1893, in the superior court- of Washington, for the county of Pacific, judgment was recovered against said George H. Holcomb for $766.08, on which there was due and unpaid at the time this action ivas brought the sum of $1,142. Execution Avas not issued on this judgment until August 9, 1898, and it was returned unsatisfied September 13, 1898. This judgment has been renewed. Ida…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wittenbrock v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wright v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Irwin v. HolbrookWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Johnston v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Noyes v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Gaskill v. Northern Assurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Escrow Service Co. v. CresslerWashington Supreme Court · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API