Legal Opinion

Application of Myron Pantzer and Milton Feier

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 5, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Judge.

The appellants have appealed the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 9 and 11 to 17 in their application Serial No. 579,137, filed April 19,. 1956, entitled “Therapeutic Solutions,” as unpatentable over the prior art. No-claim is allowed.

Claim 9 is illustrative and reads as. follows:

“9. A solution of methethari-mide in excess of one-half of one percent and up to its maximum solubility in a member of the class consisting of propylene glycol, a liquid polyethylene glycol, a solution of any of these glycols with one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Alan B. HuellmantelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Douglas H. MoretonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of DaltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. In re BourdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Application of GartnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Hospital Supply Corp. v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Application of Sigurd I. LindellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Application of Floyd E. NaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of Jack E. CaveneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API