In re Britton
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeNroot, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting all of the claims of appellant’s application for a patent, 18 in number, for lacle of patentability over the cited prior art.
Claims 1 and 5 are illustrative and read as follows:
1. An infusible heat insulating plastic composition including respectively approximately four and three parts of oxid and chlorid of the same metal, approximately two and one-half parts of inert cellular material, approximately one-fourth part of glue, and approximately three and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- In re GardinerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- In re BourdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In Re LobdellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Application of Stephane Dufaure De LajarteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.