Legal Opinion

Crucible Steel Co. v. Ladd

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 12, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 2459-61Published

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, District Judge.

This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff, Crucible Steel Company of America, under Title 35, Section 145 of the United States Code, to authorize the defendant, Commissioner of Patents, to issue to plaintiff Letters Patent containing claims 48 through 53, inclusive, of application Serial No. 577,461, filed by Robert I. Jaffee and Horace R. Ogden on April 11, 1956. This application is a continuation-in-part of various earlier filed applications.

The claims in suit are substantial copies of claims 1 through 6, inclusive, of Letters Patent No. 2,864,697, granted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Stanziale.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. In Re DraegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  3. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Frederick C. Bersworth and the Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Wemple v. PeirceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API