Legal Opinion
Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. Watson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 17, 1957No. Civ. A. 2520-54PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURRAN, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff, Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc., under Title 35, Section 145 of the United States Code, to authorize the defendant, Commissioner of Patents, to issue to the plaintiff Letters Patent containing Claims 16 to 33, inclusive, of application Serial No. 229,143, entitled “Processing of Alloys”, filed by Milton B. Vordahl on May 31, 1951. Claims 32 and 33 of the application were cancelled and removed from the case before trial, leaving Claims 16 to 31, inclusive, for consideration by the Court. The aforementioned application is a division…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Gillman v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Matheson v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Pyrene Mfg. Co. v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Application of Lyle B. BorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
- Howe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Incorporated v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.