Legal Opinion

Sackett v. Starr

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1949No. Civ. 3890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, Acting P. J.

The amended complaint upon which the cause was tried sets forth two counts. In the first, plaintiff seeks specific performance of an agreement, based upon certain preliminary negotiations and written correspondence, for the purchase and sale of certain real property located in Riverside County. In the second count he seeks specific performance in the purchase and sale of the same property based upon the doctrine of equitable estoppel. Defendant answered the complaint, denied generally its allegations, set up an affirmative defense, and by way of cross-complaint asked that his title be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Chichester v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Wilson v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Bebek & BrkichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Frederickson & Watson Construction Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. FHP Health Ctr. v. Gov't of GuamSuperior Court of Guam · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API