Legal Opinion

Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Bebek & Brkich

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1956No. Civ. 16608PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This appeal involves the question as to whether the evidence shows, as a matter of law, that a contract existed between the plaintiff Leo F. Piazza Paving Company, a corporation, and the defendants Bebek and Brkich, operators of a partnership. The trial court found that no contract existed. Plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff is a general contractor engaged in road construction. The defendants are pipe laying contractors. The state called for bids for the construction of Stevens Creek Road in Santa Clara County, bids to be submitted by September 10,1952. Plaintiff desired to bid on that project.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Canavan v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Sackett v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gendzier v. BieleckiSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. N. Litterio & Company, Inc. v. Glassman Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. All-Dixie Insurance Agency, Inc. v. MoffattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API