Legal Opinion
United States v. Aangamik 15 Calcium Pangamate
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 29, 1980No. 77 C 662, 77 C 1526, 77 C 1647, 77 C 3210, 77 C 3314 and 77 C 4219PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
This matter is before the court for a ruling following a bench trial beginning on December 12,1979 and ending on December 19, 1979.
This is an action for a civil in rem seizure and injunction brought pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301, et seq., (the “Act”). Plaintiff is seeking condemnation, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 334, of an article of food generally referred to as Aangamik 15 tablets.
Plaintiff commenced six in rem seizure actions, one each in the Districts of New Jersey,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels, More or Less, Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, Douglas Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. 41 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. 184 Barrels Dried Whole EggsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1943
- United States v. Art. of Food Consist. of 10 Drums, Etc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1976
- United States v. An Article Of FoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. An Article of Food, Etc., Foodscience Laboratories, Inc., Claimant-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Foodscience Corp. v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1984
- United States v. An Article of Food, Etc., Foodscience Laboratories, Inc., Claimant-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982