Legal Opinion
United States v. Art. of Food Consist. of 10 Drums, Etc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided August 31, 1976No. 75-93 C (1)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
414 F.Supp. 793 (1976)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
ARTICLE OF FOOD CONSISTING OF 10 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF OROTIC ACID, Defendant.
No. 75-93 C (1).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
April 1, 1976.
As Amended August 31, 1976.
Barry A. Short, U. S. Atty., Wesley D. Wedemeyer, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Elliott P. Koenig, St. Louis, Mo., Dilling & Dilling, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MEREDITH, Chief Judge.
This matter was tried to the Court. The Court has been duly advised by testimony, exhibits, and briefs of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. An Article of Food, Etc., Foodscience Laboratories, Inc., Claimant-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- The National Nutritional Foods Association, the National Association of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Solgar Co., Inc. v. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Food and Drug Administration, Miles H. Robinson, Pro Se v. Donald Kennedy, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. 29 Cartons, More or Less, of an Article of FoodDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
- United States v. Aangamik 15 Calcium PangamateDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.