Legal Opinion
United States v. An Article of Food, Etc., Foodscience Laboratories, Inc., Claimant-Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 21, 1982No. 81-1114PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Chief Judge.
The United States filed its amended complaint in this in rem food condemnation case in May 1979. The defendant food comprises numerous cases containing tablets of Aangamik 15, also known as “Calcium Pan-gamate,” “Pangamic Acid,” “Vitamin B-15,” “Gluconic 15,” “Sport 15,” or “the famous Russian formula.” Aangamik 15 is produced in Burlington, Vermont by the other defendant and claimant herein, Food-Science Laboratories, Inc., and then shipped to various points around the country. According to the government’s complaint, the tablets are an adulterated food under 21 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. 41 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States of America, Libellant-Appellant v. 1,500 Cases More or Less, Tomato PasteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. General Foods Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1978
- United States v. Art. of Food Consist. of 10 Drums, Etc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. 29 Cartons of an Article of FoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Nutrilab, Inc. v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- American Health Products Co., Inc. v. HayesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- United States v. An Article of Food, Etc., Coco Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. 45/194 Kg. Drums of Pure Vegetable Oil, Efamol, Ltd., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.