Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1926No. 16584PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Neither under the negotiable-instruments law adopted August 18, 1924 (Ga. L. 1924, p. 126), nor under the law as it previously existed, does the legal title to a negotiable promissory note, payable to order, pass to a transferee for a consideration of love and affection only and not for value, except by indorsement upon the instrument itself or upon a paper attached to it. Such a transferee, therefore, acquires no legal title to the note by a separate transfer to him in writing executed by the payee but unattached to the note. Ga. L. 1924, p. 126, §§ 31, 49; Citizens First National Bank of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haug v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Citizens First National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Citizens First National Bank v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bond v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Bonuso v. Shroyer Loan & Finance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API