Legal Opinion

Bond v. Maxwell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1929No. 19634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. A suit at law upon a promissory note can be maintained only in the name of the holder of the legal title to the instrument, and this is true even though the plaintiff may have a perfect equitable title thereto. Benson v. Abbott, 95 Ga. 69 (22 S. E. 127); Burch v. Daniel, 101 Ga. 228 (28 S. E. 622); Brown v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 146 Ga. 123 (90 S. E. 856); Buchholz v. Sapp, 148 Ga. 352 (96 S. E. 858); Allen v. Commercial Credit Co., 155 Ga. 545 (117 S. E. 650); Hill v. Maffett, 3 Ga. App. 89 (59 S. E. 325); Herring v. First National Bank, 13 Ga. App. 492 (79 S. E. 359); Wilson v. Brice, 23…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Benson v. Abbott, Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Allen v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Hill v. MaffettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Moughon v. MastersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curry v. Washington National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Tolbert v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Bennett v. BottomsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. McMullen v. CarltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Hemphill v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API