Robinson v. Beaty
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Bryan County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. Action by R. A. Beaty against Colman Robinson, Judgment for plaintiff for part of the amount sought to be recovered, denying his claim to a lien, motions for new trial filed by each party overruled, and defendant brings error, and plaintiff files a cross-petition in error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action on account to recover the purchase price of certain building material, and to foreclose a ma-terialman’s lien upon certain lands, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be called “plaintiff” and “defendant” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
The petition of the plaintiff was in the usual form and stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The answer of the defendant consisted of:(1) A general denial.(2) Allegations, in effect, that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crouch v. . GutmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Keeler v. HerrIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Evans v. HowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Montandon & Co. v. DeasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Keel v. IngersollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hunt v. Tulsa Terrazzo & Mosaic Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Kelley v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- O. Q. Kizziar and Mildred Kizziar, His Wife v. B. L. Dollar, an Individual Doing Business as B. L. Dollar Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Roosevelt Materials Company, a Corporation v. Nolan Brothers, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Holloman v. BrittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.