Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ethicon, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 2, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00851Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BARBARA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:20-cv-00851-MO ETHICON, INC., et al., OPINION & ORDER Defendants. MOSMAN, J., In May 2022, Defendants Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (jointly, “Ethicon”) moved to exclude evidence regarding Plaintiff Barbara Smith’s product defect and failure to warn claims. Mot. for FRE 104 Hr’g [ECF 210]. After oral argument and supplemental briefing, I denied the motion. Order [ECF 226]. I now write to explain my ruling. I. Exclusion of Dr. Elliott’s Report Central to Smith’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  4. Baughman v. PinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Hudjohn v. S&G MACHINERY CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API