Legal Opinion

Holman v. Uglow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The first assignment of error submits the question whether the circuit court erred when it overruled the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit which was based upon the contention (we quote from the motion) that “the evidence submitted on the part of the plaintiff shows contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff’s decedent which would bar recovery. ” The answer alleged that the deceased was guilty of negligence in the following particulars:

“(a) In occupying a place of danger by walking behind said Voth automobile and pushing it along the pavement while it was in the right-hand lane of travel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Deitchler v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Victor Lynn Lines, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Borgert v. SPURLINGOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Williamson Truck Lines, Inc. v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Flande v. BrazelOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Freeman v. SmitWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API