Legal Opinion

Borgert v. SPURLING

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Stanley G. Spurling, from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action against Spurling and two others to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The question for decision is whether the defendant Spurling was entitled to a directed verdict.

The facts of the case are as follows: On the night of August 1, 1948, the plaintiff, Ned Borgert, and six others — four young men and two young women — were returning to their homes from a dance, traveling in a 1935 Ford sedan which was owned and driven by Don Potterf, one of the party. At…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Chadwick v. EkWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tibbetts v. DuntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  5. Morris v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bockman v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lehr v. GRESHAM BERRY GROWERSOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Yates v. LargeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Alldrin v. LucasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Kranendonk v. Gregory & Swapp, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API