Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Smit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1938No. 26796. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

The plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendants for injuries sustained by him while assisting in replacing a tire on a vehicle owned by the defendants Smit and driven by their employee, the defendant Zonnevelt.

The Smits, who were engaged in business as contract carriers under permit from the state, employed Zonnevelt to drive one of their trucks operating between Burlington, in Skagit county, and Seattle. The trips to Seattle were generally made at night. On the night of the accident, June 4, 1934, the plaintiff, sixty-four years of age, solicited and obtained from Zonnevelt…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Deitchler v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Schacht v. QuickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Fiesel v. New York Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Rock Springs v. Police Protection Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Caron v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Mellor v. Ten Sleep Cattle CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API