Legal Opinion

State v. Sossamon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1963No. 508PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Whether defendant's motion in arrest of judgment should have been allowed depends upon whether the amended warrant is fatally defective. This must be determined by application of the well settled legal principles stated below.

“A valid warrant or indictment is an essential of jurisdiction.” S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166; S. v. Thornton, 251 N.C. 658, 660, 111 S.E. 2d 901. A warrant or indictment must charge all the essential elements of the alleged criminal offense. S. v. Morgan, supra. The reasons underlying this requirement are summarized by Parker, J., in S. v. Greer, 238 N.C.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. J. Murray Hooker, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  2. Taggard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API