Commonwealth v. Bartol
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Curiam,
TMs case involves a direct appeal from judgment of sentence after appellant’s conviction on charges of attempted burglary and larceny of a motor vehicle.
Counsel for appellant stated in his brief that he had “very carefully reviewed the record in this case, including pretrial procedures, the guilty plea, sentencing as well as correspondence from the appellant. After due consideration and much research, defense counsel feels that he is unable to offer any argument on appellant’s behalf on which, relief could possibly be secured in this Court. Counsel therefore respectfully…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. CovingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. HurstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LiskaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Cleghorn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Commonwealth v. TracySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BreonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971