Commonwealth v. White
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
Order affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen
in Support oe Affirmance :
Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 239 A. 2d 201 (1968), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. ed. 2d 493 (1967), are not authority for the position taken by Justice O’Brien. In both of these cases the issue came before the court upon direct appeal. Since the instant appeal relates to a post-conviction hearing, it is my opinion that we are not bound by the determination in Baker and Anders.
Mr. Chief Justice Bell and Mr. Justice Jones join in this opinion.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BartolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. CovingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. SparksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969