Commonwealth v. Tracy
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
On September 29, 1978, this Court entered the following Order:
*358NOW, to-wit, this 29th day of September, 1978, counsel for defendant is notified that his brief does not meet minimal standards for an advocate’s brief on behalf of a criminal appellant to our Court. Counsel is therefore ordered to proceed by filing either: (1) a proper advocates brief on the merits, or (2) a proper withdrawal request and brief meeting all of the requirements set forth in Commonwealth v. Liska, 252 Pa.Super. 103, 380 A.2d 1303 (1977). In either case, counsel is to file a new brief within thirty (30) days, or risk…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. LiskaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BartolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981