Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tracy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1979No. 575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On September 29, 1978, this Court entered the following Order:

*358NOW, to-wit, this 29th day of September, 1978, counsel for defendant is notified that his brief does not meet minimal standards for an advocate’s brief on behalf of a criminal appellant to our Court. Counsel is therefore ordered to proceed by filing either: (1) a proper advocates brief on the merits, or (2) a proper withdrawal request and brief meeting all of the requirements set forth in Commonwealth v. Liska, 252 Pa.Super. 103, 380 A.2d 1303 (1977). In either case, counsel is to file a new brief within thirty (30) days, or risk…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. LiskaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. BartolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API