Application of Arthur Philip Jentoft
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 3, 9,13, and 14 of application serial No. 144,610, filed October 12, 1961, for “Extensible Plug Valve.” In his brief, appellant “waives the appeal” as to claims 13 and 14 so as to them the appeal will be dismissed, leaving for consideration only claims 3 and 9. 1
This is an obviousness-type double patenting case in which a terminal disclaimer has been filed and considered below. The sole ground of rejection is double patenting founded on certain claims of appellant Jentoft’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Saul KayeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In re SiuCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of David G. BraithwaiteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Tidewater Patent Development Company, Incorporated v. K. M. Kitchen and Virginia M. Kitchen, Partners Trading as K. M. Kitchenbeauty Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In re OrnumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Application of Oliver C. EckelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Herschel T. White and Arthur W. Langer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Charles J. Plank and Edward J. RosinskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.