Application of Charles J. Plank and Edward J. Rosinski
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals 1 affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-24 and 40 of appellants’ application serial No. 195,430, filed May 17, 1962, entitled “Catalyst and Conversion of Organic Compounds in the Presence Thereof.” No claim has been allowed.
The invention is a catalyst composition and its method of preparation. Claims 1 and 18 are illustrative:
1. A catalytic composition comprising a finely divided crystalline aluminosilicate having a silica to alumina mole ratio in excess of 3 distributed throughout and held suspended in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Saul KayeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of David G. BraithwaiteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Oliver C. EckelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Francis J. BoylanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- General Foods Corporation v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle MbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. WR Grace & CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
- Application of Joseph Francis SkrivanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.